Fact-Checking Process

Review Workflow

Articles are reviewed for factual accuracy, plain-language clarity, risk context, professional English usage, and separation from financial, legal, tax, or investment advice.

For technical topics, editors compare claims with primary documentation where possible. For policy or tax topics, editors prefer official sources and clearly state that personal advice requires qualified professionals.

What We Check

Reviewers check definitions, examples, date-sensitive statements, source links, internal links, warnings about limitations, and whether the article overstates certainty.

If a topic has changed since publication, the updated date and article update history should explain that a review occurred.

• No guaranteed-profit or price-prediction language.
• Clear distinction between mechanism, example, risk, and opinion.
• Primary sources preferred for technical and regulatory claims.
• Visible author, publish date, updated date, and source list.